Uldrich-125x250
Banner_125x125
Convergence_conference_125

Install a Future Scanner button on your blog.

How 'bout uploading memories, feelings into a perfect body

June 23 2008 / by futuretalk
Category: Other   Year: General   Rating: 8 Hot

By Dick Pelletier

The World Health Organization describes good health as “a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being”. This sounds like utopia, but what does it actually mean? Besides family, friends, a faithful pet, and plenty of clean air and sunshine, what else contributes to our well-being? We could add feeling happy, feeling smart, and being in control of our bodies.

According to a recent article in New Scientist Magazine, most people enjoy the conveniences in today’s modern homes – air conditioning, entertainment, appliances, etc. Cars also provide freedom and joy on the open road; and the Internet empowers us with easy access to information and new ways to communicate with friends.

Modern drugs prevent or delay the onset of heart disease, cancer, and mental disorders, which give us greater control over our bodies.

But life has not always been this good: 100 years ago, average lifespan was in the 40’s. Child mortality, malaria, TB, malnutrition, and warfare were the most common culprits that brought life to an end. Yet, in spite of living short, disease-ridden lives, our ancestors survived.

My great grandmother lived from 1855 to 1946. At a young age, she left her home in Indiana and headed west. She married, homesteaded a farm, and gave birth to 15 children. This would be difficult for many, but Grandma was tough. Fortunately for me, she survived and our lineage continued. (cont.)

Times are much better today. Lifespan has nearly doubled since Grandma’s generation. A growing number of people now enjoy good health into their 90’s and beyond; and the future looks even brighter ahead.

Encouraged by recent RNAi genetic discoveries and stem cell possibilities, scientists are racing to conquer all disease and even create enhancements for a healthy body. Changing body height, facial features – even personality – might all be possible in the near future.

Intelligence expert Joseph LeDoux, in his book “Synaptic Self”, explains how nurture and nature both help the brain create a sense of “self”. And the future looks even brighter, LeDoux says. “By as early as the 2020s, powerful neural computers could enable our brains to think faster and instantly recall any thought, dream, or feeling.”

Even more amazing, AI entrepreneur Ray Kurzweil claims that in the 2030s, technologies could allow us to copy, or “upload” our mind, memories, feelings – all that describe us as an individual – and store that copy in a safe place for later transferring to a new body should something happen to the original.

Will this mind-boggling future happen? Driven by commerce and an innate desire to improve, most futurists say it will. Humans are forever searching for better health and happiness, and technology points the way.

Someday our grandchildren (and us too, should we survive) might look back at early 21st century life and wonder how we ever lived in such a hazardous world – much as we view the primitive conditions our ancestors experienced.

The future is ours and it’s filled with miracles. Stay positive, keep healthy, and enjoy.

How many years of healthy living do you think technology will provide for you?

or Show Results

Comment Thread (7 Responses)

  1. So, lets say you created a copy of yourself and saved it in some safe place. Later something happened to original you and backup copy was used to restore you. What if intentionally or by mistake two or more instances of you were created? Which one do you think you would wake up in? The first one? The last? All of them? Wouldn’t it be logical to conclude that it would actually be neither one?

    Posted by: johnfrink   June 23, 2008
    Vote for this comment - Recommend

  2. Good comment Johnfrink; I’m not sure I would want another me running around, in fact today, I am sure that I would not.

    However, will there be some kind of failsafe systems to prevent duplicates from being created? I hope that there will be.

    On the other hand, with increased intelligence (artificial nano-neurons) available in this future time, maybe the logic of the day might uncover a myriad of advantages for extra me’s.

    Would I be convinced that the duplicate was really me? I’m sure that I would be; but again, who knows? Comments welcome.

    Posted by: futuretalk   June 23, 2008
    Vote for this comment - Recommend

  3. On a side note – your great grandmother sure saw an incredible amount of change in her life. She pretty much witnessed the entire industrial revolution. I think ostensibly, that 100 years (give or take) was the most dramatic period of change in history, given that everything happened at scale. The ability to move people, chattel and information that was enabled by rail/auto/plane and the telegraph/telephone coupled with the advent of electricity changed the way we lived in a more obvious way than that of the information/computing revolution. When you think about it that way it’s easy to see why many folks project change in a linear fashion.

    Posted by: Jeff Hilford   June 23, 2008
    Vote for this comment - Recommend

  4. Yes, Grandma experienced an amazing life. She was ten when the Civil War began and about half of her cousins and uncles were from Kentucky and fought for the Confederate cause, while the other half was Union. She even saw brother fighting against brother.

    And on her first trip to Oregon, she made part of the trip in covered wagons as the transcontinental railroad routes were not complete at that time. She told me that Indians attacked the wagon train, but they were only armed with hatchets and bows and arrows, and the wagon masters easily warded them off with rifles and pistols.

    Technology has come a long way since Grandma’s day, but we haven’t seen anything yet. Exponential advance experts believe that we will see progress equal to about 20,000 years during the 21st century, which makes a “magical future” highly likely to become reality.

    Posted by: futuretalk   June 23, 2008
    Vote for this comment - Recommend

  5. What johnfrink brings up is the same issue I’ve had in the past with mind uploading and teleportation (with disintegration of the original body) – there’s no plausible means of the original “you” continuing consciousness in a new body under either. The thought experiment about activating multiple copies simultaneously is a good way to see that. Also, there’s no benefit to yourself considered strictly selfishly. In the case of restoring a copy of yourself should you die, you (the original) wouldn’t be able to tell it happened. (In the case of teleportation, the experience would be indistinguishable from death to the original.)

    But, like a life insurance policy on yourself, it could be a safeguard for friends and family, that they’d still have you around in the case of an accident. The new “you” would presumably have full memories up to the point of copying, so at worst “you” would have a sort of amnesia about everything missed between the copying and the restoration.

    Posted by: gremlinn   June 23, 2008
    Vote for this comment - Recommend

  6. Future technologies could allow continuous wireless transmission of every life moment transmitted 24/7 to a secure digital storage location. In event of a fatal accident, nanobots could instantly create and teleport a “new you” to the accident site allowing life to continue uninterrupted; you would not even realized you had died.

    Granted, this is an optimistic view. Will technologies eventually evolve to make this scenario happen? Positive futurists believe that with the “Intelligence Revolution” expected between 2035 and 2050, this could become our reality.

    Posted by: futuretalk   June 23, 2008
    Vote for this comment - Recommend

  7. Gremlinn makes a good point. If your consciousness or sense of self were not continuous, then the benefits of any type of copies or replacements that did not bridge your consciousness would be solely external (i.e. family, friends, society).

    Posted by: Jeff Hilford   June 23, 2008
    Vote for this comment - Recommend

Related content from the Future Scanner and Future Blogger